ON THE DOT
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
  • Headlines
  • Articles
  • Lifestyles
  • Stories
  • ON THE DOT TO
  • Hindi
  • About us
  • Contact
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
  • Headlines
  • Articles
  • Lifestyles
  • Stories
  • ON THE DOT TO
  • Hindi
  • About us
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
ON THE DOT
No Result
View All Result
Home Headlines

US Court Strikes Down Trump-Era Immigration Policies Targeting 39 Countries

by On The Dot
June 6, 2026
Reading Time: 1 min read
0 0
0
Diplomacy or Deception? Trump’s Secret Strike on Iran

File Photo

Washington : A US federal court has struck down a series of immigration policies introduced during the administration of former President Donald Trump that subjected immigrants from 39 countries to heightened scrutiny and prolonged delays in the processing of their applications.

Chief US District Judge John McConnell Jr. of Rhode Island ruled that the policies implemented by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) exceeded the agency’s legal authority and were inconsistent with federal immigration law. The court found that the measures caused unnecessary delays and legal uncertainty for thousands of applicants.

Under the challenged policies, immigration applications submitted by individuals from several countries across Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America were subjected to additional reviews and investigations. As a result, applications for asylum, permanent residency (green cards), citizenship, and other immigration benefits often remained pending for extended periods.

RELATED STORIES

India Calls Out Pakistan’s Double Standards on Global Stage

India Calls for Review of Outdated UN Mediation Frameworks

June 24, 2026
US Senate Votes To Halt Iran War In Rebuke To Trump

US Senate Votes To Halt Iran War In Rebuke To Trump

June 24, 2026

In his ruling, Judge McConnell stated that federal agencies cannot impose discriminatory practices based solely on an applicant’s country of origin. The court emphasized that immigration authorities must operate within the limits established by law and follow fair administrative procedures.

The case was brought by immigrant rights organizations and labor groups, which argued that the policies unfairly targeted certain nationalities and deprived many individuals of employment opportunities, family reunification, and other legal benefits while their applications remained unresolved.

Advocacy groups welcomed the decision, describing it as a significant victory for immigrant communities and the rule of law. They said the ruling could help thousands of affected applicants move forward with their immigration cases and restore fairness to the application process.

2

  • Headlines
  • Articles
  • Lifestyles
  • Stories
  • ON THE DOT TO
  • Hindi
  • About us
  • Contact

© 2020 ON THE DOT

No Result
View All Result
  • Headlines
  • Articles
  • Lifestyles
  • Stories
  • ON THE DOT TO
  • Hindi
  • About us
  • Contact

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In