ON THE DOT’s reply to The Guardian view on India’s farming revolt: a bitter harvest | Narendra Modi | The Guardian
1) Guardian is a person who protects or defends something.
Here you may be Guardian of your country. But not ours. Your predecessors already looted India in terms of today money about USD 47 trillion on the same pretext. So, stop this atleast now.
2) Guardian a person who is legally responsible for the care of someone who is unable to manage their own affairs.
We are able to manage ours. You have done more than enough to us, so please you manage yours. Your economy is shrinking, citizens are tired of lock down and your present government does not know how to handle
Anyways, now coming to your article:
If you want and feel that Boris Johnson is the prime minister of Christians ONLY then you can call him that way. But present Government of India is democratically elected and Mr Narendra Modi represents the entire population. So, stop referring him as the India’s Hindu nationalist prime minister– come on, it has been 07 years now and elections after elections, still you are behaving as same bad Guardian.
Regarding your so much praise of Haisham – he referred to your house as elective dictatorship. Keep these views to yourself. We know how Churchil starved to death more than 03 million Indians just in 1940s. Again stop being Guardian.
Also, I do not wish to elaborate how hundreds of farming unions were consulted before and what procedure was followed before this law was passed because you do not wish to know that.
You are still in the mindset of a “GUARDIAN” which you were and are not!